Computational study of inverse ferrite spinels
Maazouzi A EL1, Masrour R1, †, Jabar A1, Hamedoun M2
Laboratory of Materials, Processes, Environment and Quality, Cadi Ayyad University, National School of Applied Sciences, Sidi Bouzid, Safi 63 46000, Morocco
Institute of Nanomaterials and Nanotechnologies, MAScIR, Rabat, Morocco

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: rachidmasrour@hotmail.com

Abstract
Abstract

The magnetic properties of inverse ferrite , and spinels have been studied using Monte Carlo simulation. We have also calculated the critical and Curie Weiss temperatures from the thermal magnetizations and inverse of magnetic susceptibilities for each system. Magnetic hysteresis cycles have been found for the four systems. Finally, we found the critical exponents associated with magnetization, magnetic susceptibility, and external magnetic field. Our results of critical and Curie Weiss temperatures are similar to those obtained by experiment results. The critical exponents are similar to those of known 3D-Ising model.

1. Introduction

Cubic ferrite has the formula , where M is a divalent atom (e.g., Fe2+, Co2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, etc). The general chemical formula of inverse spinels family can be written in the form , where the parentheses represents the cations occupying tetrahedral A sites, whereas the brackets denote the cations occupying octahedral B sites in the spinel structure. The parameter x is the degree of inversion defined as the fraction of tetrahedral sites occupied by Fe3+ cations. Ideal bulk MFe2O4 is a fully inverse spinel ferrite (x = 1). The experimental determination of x is of vital importance because the physicochemical properties exhibited by the ferrites critically depend on this parameter.[1] Besides technological applications in spin-filtering[2] and multiferroic devices,[3,4] several biomedical applications on targeting, diagnosis, and disease treatment have also been reported. In addition, the cations M and Fe in the lattice respectively occupy the tetrahedral (1/8, 1/8, 1/8) sites, Wyckoff position 8a, and octahedral (1/2, 1/2, 1/2) sites, Wyckoff position 16d. Therefore, the single positional parameter u plus the unit-cell parameter a are sufficient to determine the spinel structure. It is known that altering the occupancies of the M and Fe sites can give rise to slight variations of the spinel structure, which can affect the corresponding nature and magnitude of superexchange interactions,[5] namely, AA, BB, and AB, of which the AB interactions tend to be highly significant.

Different types of ferrite-based composites have been studied, including magnetic ferrites composed of nonmagnetic oxides and polymers.[68] For practical applications, however, Fe3O4 is the most promising candidate due to its high Curie temperature, TC=858 K, as compared to other half metals. These characteristics of Fe3O4 can be utilized in the development of tunneling magnetoresistance based devices that would operate at room temperature with high efficiency.[9,10] Experimentally, the properties of ferrites are dependent on the synthesis technique and synthesis conditions.[11] NiFe2O4 has the inverse spinel structure in bulk form where divalent metal ions (Ni2+) occupy octahedral sites and mixed spinel structure in case of nanoparticles where Ni2+ ions can occupy both tetrahedral and octahedral sites.[12] CuFe2O4 is ferromagnetically ordered for a weak magnetic field and it has wide applications due to its high thermal stability.[13] Nickel ferrite NiFe2O4 is a good example of inverse spinel ferrite and exhibits ferromagnetic nature with a Curie temperature of 858 K where half of the Fe3+ ions occupy the tetrahedral sites and the remaining ions occupy the octahedral sites, it is used in repulsive suspension for levitated railway systems, microwave absorber, magnetic liquids, magnetic refrigeration, and high density magnetic recording media.[14,15] In previous work,[16] the CoFe2O4 nanowire arrays become superparamagnetic at 600 K. High magnetostriction and strain-field derivative with low saturation field make (0 0 1) fiber textured CoFe2O4 attractive for sonar detector and force sensor applications.[17] Theoretically, the formation condition and energy of possible intrinsic point defects have been investigated by the first-principles calculations, and the effects of the intrinsic point defects on the electronic and magnetic properties of CoFe2O4 have been analyzed.[18] The experimental and numerical results using Monte Carlo simulation of the reduced magnetization and coercivity cobalt ferrite/polyvinylpyrrolidone are in relatively good agreement with each other.[19] The first-principles, mean-field, and series expansions calculations have been used to study the electronic and magnetic structures of Fe3O4.[20] Green’s function theory has been used to study the magnetic properties of CuxNi1−xFe2O4 spinels.[21] The effect of Zn doping on magnetic properties of MnFe2O4 ferrite spinel has been studied by using high temperature series expansion combined with the Padé approximant and mean field theory.[22] In the previous work,[23] silicene is an intriguing two-dimensional (2D) topological material which is closely analogous to graphene but with stronger spin–orbit coupling effect and natural compatibility with current silicon-based electronic industry. It could realize a ferromagnetic phase, super-counter-fluidity phase, and antiferromagnetic phase of polarized light that are of interest for studying spin-dependent photon-photon interactions.[24] The effect of spin transport on nonlinear excitations was investigated in a ferromagnetic nanowire with nonuniform magnetizations.[25]

In the present work, we have used the Monte Carlo simulation to study the magnetic properties of inverse ferrite , , , and spinels. The critical and Curie Weiss temperatures are obtained for each system. The magnetic hysteresis cycles have been found for the four systems. The critical exponents associated with magnetization, magnetic susceptibility, and external magnetic field have been found.

2. Ising model

In inverse spinel ferrites , the B site is occupied by two types of ions, Mn2+ and Fe3+, while the A site is occupied by Fe3+ ions. The Hamiltonian of the Ising system of inverse spinel ferrites with formula Fe3+( )O4 (with M=Co, Cu, Fe, and Ni) in an external field Hext may be put in the form with or or or , .

The values of exchange interactions JAA, , , , , and used in this work for four inverse ferrite , , , and spinels systems are given in Ref. [26] as listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

The values of exchange interactions used in this work for the spinels.

.
3. Monte Carlo simulations

The Fe3+( Fe3+)O4 is assumed to reside in the unit cells, and the system consists of total number of sites , where NA and NB are the numbers of ions in site A and site B, respectively. We have used the Monte Carlo simulation to simulate the Hamiltonian given by Eq. (1). Periodic boundary conditions on the inverse ferrite spinels have been applied. Configurations have been generated by sequentially traversing the lattice and making single-spin flip attempts. Meanwhile, Monte Carlo update was performed by choosing random spins and then flipped with Boltzmann based probability. This can be done using the conventional Metropolis algorithm (where is the energy difference between the before and the after flip, and is the Bolzmann’s constant, and T is the absolute temperature).[27] To obtain the numerical results, the data were generated with Monte Carlo steps per spin where the first Monte Carlo simulations are discarded and each Monte Carlo simulation started from a different initial condition.

The total internal energy is given by The magnetizations of spinels Fe3+( Fe3+)O4 (with M=Co, Cu, Fe, and Ni) are where Si and are the magnetic spins of the i th magnetic ions. The total magnetization is given by The corresponding magnetic susceptibilities are given by The critical exponents α, β, and γ associated with magnetization, magnetic susceptibility, and external magnetic field are given by

4. Results and discussion

In the present work, we have used the Monte Carlo simulation to study the magnetic properties of inverse ferrite , , , and spinels. The critical temperatures TC of , , , and are deduced from Figs. 1(a), 2(a), 3(a), and 4(a), respectively. The obtained values are given in Table 2. The Curie Weiss temperatures are deduced from the inverse of magnetic susceptibilities for the four inverse ferrite spinels from Figs. 1(a), 2(a), 3(a), and 4(a), respectively (see Table 1). The obtained values of TC and are near to those obtained by experiment results[28,29] and the molecular-field approximation.[30]

Fig. 1. (a) The thermal magnetization and magnetic susceptibility and (b) inverse magnetic susceptibility of spinels. The straight line in panel (b) is used to deduce the Curie Weiss temperature.
Fig. 2. (a) The thermal magnetization and magnetic susceptibility and (b) inverse magnetic susceptibility of spinels. The straight line in panel (b) is used to deduce the Curie Weiss temperature.
Fig. 3. (a) The thermal magnetization and magnetic susceptibility and (b) inverse magnetic susceptibility of spinels. The straight line in panel (b) is used to deduce the Curie Weiss temperature.
Fig. 4. (a) The thermal magnetization and magnetic susceptibility and (b) inverse magnetic susceptibility of spinels. The straight line in panel (b) is used to deduce the Curie Weiss temperature.
Table 2.

The critical and Curie Weiss temperatures obtained by Monte Carlo simulations, experiments (Ref. [25] for TC and Ref. [29] for ), and molecular-field approximation[30] for the spinels.

.

The magnetic loops of , , , and spinels are shown in Figs. 710, respectively, for several values of temperatures T = 600 K, 850 K, and 1000 K. From these curves, we deduce that the magnetic coercive field, remanent magnetization, and saturation magnetization decrease with increasing temperature (see Figs. 5(b), 6(b), 7(b), and 8(b)). This behavior is similar in magnetic properties of multilayer BaTiO3/NiFe2O4 thin films prepared by solution deposition technique in Ref. [31]. The well saturated hysteresis loops are recorded in the range from 0.2 T to −0.2 T (Figs. 58) and their shapes resemble the ferrimagnetic behavior typical for cobalt (or nickel, copper-iron) ferrite based materials.

Fig. 5. (a) Magnetic loop of for different temperatures T = 600 K, 850 K, and 1000 K, and (b) the enlarged low field region.
Fig. 6. (a) Magnetic loop of for different temperatures T = 600 K, 850 K, and 1000 K, and (b) the enlarged low field region.
Fig. 7. (a) Magnetic loop of for temperatures T = 600 K, 850 K, and 1000 K, and (b) the enlarged low field region.
Fig. 8. (a) Magnetic loop of for different temperatures T = 600 K, 850 K, and 1000 K, and (b) the enlarged low field region.

Figure 911 present the magnetic loop of , , , and for temperatures T = 600 K, 850 K, and 1000 K, respectively. The saturation magnetization and the magnetic coercive field decrease as the number of electrons in the valence shell of the magnetic atom (3d) increase, such as given in the periodic table. For a weak external magnetic field, the four systems present the ferromagnetical order and the superparamagnetic order for a higher external magnetic field such as given in Ref. [13].

Fig. 9. Magnetic loops of , , , and at temperature T = 600 K.
Fig. 10. Magnetic loops of , , , and at temperature T = 850 K.
Fig. 11. Magnetic loops of , , , and at temperature T = 1000 K.

We have calculated the critical exponents β, γ, and δ associated with the magnetization, magnetic susceptibility, and external magnetic field using Eq. (7). The obtained values of β, γ, and δ are given in Table 3. The obtained values are comparable with those given by 3D Ising model (β=0.22, γ=1.24, and δ=4.78).[3137]

Table 3.

The critical exponents associated with the magnetization, magnetic susceptibility, and external magnetic field of the spinels.

.
5. Conclusion

The magnetic properties of inverse ferrite , , , and spinels are investigated. The critical temperatures and the Curie Weiss temperatures are found using Monte Carlo simulation. The obtained values of TC and are near to those obtained by experiments. The magnetic coercive filed, remanent magnetization, and saturation magnetization decrease with increasing temperature. The critical exponents β, γ, and δ are deduced. The obtained values are comparable with those given by 3D Ising model.[3137]

Reference
[1] Tamayo H S García K E Barrero C A 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 471 242
[2] Ramos A V Guittet M J Moussy J B Mattana R Deranlot C Petroff F Gatel C 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 122107
[3] Zheng H Wang J Lofl S E Ma Z Ardabili L M Zhao T Riba L S Shinde S R Ogale S B Bai F Viehl D Jia Y Schlom D G Wuttig M Roytburd A Ramesh R 2004 Science 303 661
[4] Wu Y Wan J G Liu J M Wang G 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 152902
[5] Kodama R H Berkowitz A E McNiff E J Jr. Foner S 1997 J. Appl. Phys. 81 5552
[6] Wang J Luo J Fan Q Suzuki M Suzuki I S Engelhard M H Lin Y Kim N Wang J Q Zhong C J 2005 J. Phys. Chem. 109 21593
[7] Casu A Casula M F Corrias A Falqui A Loche D Marras S 2007 J. Phys. Chem. 111 916
[8] Murillo N Ochoteco E Alesanco Y Pomposo J A Rodriguez J Gonzalez J Val J J D Gonzalez J M Brtel M R Lopez A R A 2004 Nanotechnology 15 S322
[9] Zhang Z Satpathy S 1991 Phys. Rev. 44 13319
[10] Yanase A Siratori K 1984 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 53 312
[11] Joshi S Kumar M Pandey H Singh M Pal P 2018 J. Alloys Compnds. 768 287
[12] Joshi S Kumar M Chhoker S Srivastava G Jewariya M Singh V N 2014 J. Mol. Struct. 1076 55
[13] Ahmed Y M Z Hessien M M Rashad M M Ibrahim I A 2009 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 181
[14] Ramankutty C G Sugunan S 2001 Appl. Catal. 218 39
[15] Reddy C V G Manorama S V Rao V 1999 J. Sens. Actuators B: Chemical 55 90
[16] Yuan J J Zhao Q Xu Y S Liu Z G Du X B Wen G H 2009 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 2795
[17] Wang J Li J Li X Bao X Gao X 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 462 53
[18] Huang Y L Fan W B Hou Y H Guo K X Ouyang Y F Liu Z W 2017 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 429 263
[19] Mirzaee Sh shayesteh S F Mahdavifar S Hekmatara S H 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 393 1
[20] Masrour R Hlil E K Hamedoun M Benyoussef A Mounkachi O El Moussaoui H 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 378 37
[21] Salmi S Masrour R El Grini A Bouslykhane K Hourmatallah A Benzakour N Hamedoun M 2018 J. Cluster. Sci. 29 493
[22] Masrour R Hamedoun M Benyoussef A 2011 Chem. Phys. Lett. 513 280
[23] Zhang X L Liu Z F Liu W M 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 2908
[24] Ji A C Xie X C Liu W M 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 183602
[25] He P B Liu W M 2005 Phys. Rev. 72 064410
[26] Srivastava C M Srinivasan G Nanadikar N G 1979 Phys. Rev. 19 499
[27] Metropolis N Rosenbluth A W Rosenbluth M N Teller A H Teller E 1953 J. Chem. Phys. 21 1087
[28] Smit J Wijn H P J 1959 Ferrites New York Wiley 143
[29] Benenson W Harris J W Stöcker H Lutz H 2002 Handbook of Physics Berlin Springer-Verlag
[30] Bercoff P G Bertorello H R 1997 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 169 314
[31] Goldner L S Ahlers G 1992 Phys. Rev. 45 13129
[32] Le Guillou J C Zinn-Justin J 1985 J. Phys. Lett. 46 137
[33] Baillie C F Gupta R Hawick K A Pawley G S 1992 Phys. Rev. 45 10438
[34] Ferrenberg A M Landau D P 1991 Phys. Rev. 44 5081
[35] Adler J 1983 J. Phys. 16 3585
[36] Baker G A J Nickel B G Meiron D I 1978 Phys. Rev. 17 1365
[37] George M J Rehr J 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 2063